Does Religion Increase Moral Behavior?

Article · March 2016with11,085 Reads
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.009
Abstract
Religion affects both moral decision-making and moral behavior. Compared to the more utilitarian non-believers, religious believers tend to endorse a meta-ethics rooted in deontic rules and views of objective moral truths. Believers are also more likely to endorse authority, loyalty and purity as motives for moral concern. The moral importance of prosocial behavior, however, is endorsed across the religiosity spectrum. Religiosity is associated with higher self-reports, but not behavioral measures of prosocial behavior. This discrepancy can be explained on the one hand by a tendency for the religious to be higher in impression management and self-enhancement, and on the other hand by a failure of lab-based behavioral tasks to capture the real life circumstances under which religion inspires prosocial behavior.

Do you want to read the rest of this article?

Comments

Appalachian State University
Thanks!
Appalachian State University
Hi Azim--has this come out yet? I can't find the actual article in published form, and am assuming it must be out by now. Wanting to cite you in a current piece. Thanks!
September 3, 2015
University of California, Irvine
whoops. fixed in proofed version.
Project
I would like to discover differencies regarding special life skills (for example empaty, improvement supporting human networks, problem solving, stress management) between prison inmates, offenders…" [more]
Article
December 2016 · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · Impact Factor: 1.76
    Religious people differ in how punishing or forgiving they see their Gods. Such different beliefs may have distinct consequences in encouraging people to act in normative ways. Though a number of priming studies have shown a positive causal relationship between religion and normative behavior, few have primed different aspects of religion, and none has examined the punishing/forgiving... [Show full abstract]
    Article
    November 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · Impact Factor: 5.08
      Christian doctrine considers mental states important in judging a person's moral status, whereas Jewish doctrine considers them less important. The authors provide evidence from 4 studies that American Jews and Protestants differ in the moral import they attribute to mental states (honoring one's parents, thinking about having a sexual affair, and thinking about harming an animal). Although... [Show full abstract]
      Article
      May 2012 · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · Impact Factor: 1.76
        Two studies focused on the relationship between religiosity and intergroup bias. In Study 1, participants completed brief measures of religiosity and spirituality and attitudes toward religiously value-consistent in-groups (Christians, heterosexuals) and value-violating out-groups (atheists, Muslims, and gay men). As predicted, self-reported religiosity and spirituality correlated positively... [Show full abstract]
        Discover more